Inexplicable insect metamorphosis

Posted by Creation On The Web - July 6, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments The change of caterpillar to butterfly requires exquisite programming. But the origin of this programming baffles evolutionists.

 


Karl Kruszelnicki: still missing the missing links

Posted by Creation On The Web - July 4, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Australian science personality Dr Karl Kruszelnicki takes creationists to task over transitional forms. Are his criticisms valid?

 


Ventastega-not a leg to stand on

Posted by Creation On The Web - July 3, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments What of the latest ‘missing link’ offered up for fish-to-tetrapod evolution?

 


Ventastega: not a leg to stand on

Posted by Creation On The Web - July 3, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments What of the latest ‘missing link’ offered up for fish-to-tetrapod evolution?

 


An objective ancestry test for fossil bones

Posted by Creation On The Web - July 2, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments How can we determine ancestry from the scant evidence often presented for human evolution by evolutionary anthropology?

 


Theropod and sauropod dinosaurs sighted in PNG?

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 30, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments People in the West New Britain region of Papua New Guinea have recounted seeing a creature ‘closely matching’ an artist’s reconstruction of a Therizinosaurus in a dinosaur handbook, except for the appearance of the head.

 


Marvellous moth motif

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 29, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments An amazing portrait of a mammal’s face—on the wings of a moth—defies Darwinian explanations in its sheer detail.

 


Refuting sophisticated pro-abortion arguments

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 27, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Some pro-abortionist philosophers advance arguments of which even most pro-abort politicians are unaware. But they are important to answer, as the culture moves further from sanctity of innocent human life.

 


Refuting contrived pro-abortion arguments

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 27, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Some pro-abortionist philosophers advance arguments of which even most pro-abort politicians are unaware. But they are important to answer, as the culture moves further from sanctity of innocent human life.

 


Archaeology ’surprise’

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 26, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments The discovery in Jerusalem of relics said to be from the time of Nehemiah has ‘amazed’ and ‘astonished’ archaeologists.

 


Linguistics and the Tower of Babel

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 25, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments How the account in Genesis 11 accurately records the origin of different languages.

 


Nucleic acid bases in Murchison meteorite?

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 24, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Have scientists really found nucleobases from outer space? Does this prove that life started ‘out there’?

 


How potassium-argon dating works

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 23, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Why it has tended to reinforce what geologists already believed.

 


Life: a gift from God

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 22, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments An intensive care specialist points out how doctors who have traditionally been taught to revere life are becoming increasingly caught up in a ‘culture of death’.

 


The Fall, Curse and Satan

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 20, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Who is Satan, when did he fall and why, and what is his part in our sin? What did the subsequent Fall of mankind change?

 


Sir David Attenborough: so much to live for; nothing to die for!

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 19, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Are there answers to Sir David Attenborough’s objections to the gospel?

 


The stress/heat flow paradox of the San Andreas Fault, California

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 18, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments What’s wrong with the traditional uniformitarian explanations of the San Andreas Fault?

 


Ministry programs for your church

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 17, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments See the range of ministry programs designed to meet the needs of churches and Christian organizations

 


Earning respect from Muslims

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 16, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments The ‘Christians should tolerate other faiths’ proponents ought to take note: Muslims expect Christians to believe that Jesus is the only way to God!

 


Deep secrets: cetacean communication

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 15, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments The world’s loudest creatures live in the sea; ponder the sophisticated communication systems (sometimes over mind-boggling distances) and abilities of whales, and the evolutionary puzzle they present.

 


Greenland ice cores

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 11, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Implicit evidence for catastrophic deposition.

 


Vestigial arguments: remnants of evolution

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 10, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Do claimed vestigial organs argue against a designer?

 


A life of ups and downs

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 8, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Forest research scientist Dr Geoff Downes was often taught that Genesis is a myth. But he now knows better.

 


Ancient mutant Jamaican sea cows?

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 6, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Have they really found fossil sea cows with legs instead of flippers?

 


MOND over dark matter?

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 4, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Suggestions for a Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) may mean that a fundamentally new physics is needed.

 


Serial cell differentiation: intricate system of design

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 3, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments How do mature multicelled creatures maintain bodily integrity?

 


Is evolution compatible with religion and free will? What does a recent survey of evolutionary …

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 2, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments A survey of evolutionary scientists in American Scientist reveals what evolutionists really think about the origin of religious belief, and whether we really have voluntary will.

 


Do rivers erode through mountains?

Posted by Creation On The Web - June 1, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Have you ever noticed that many of the world’s rivers flow through mountain ranges rather than around them?

 


Searching for needles in a haystack

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 28, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Just how difficult would it be for mutations to generate new valuable genes by chance?

 


Indiana Jones and the Spinning of Tales

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 27, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments The latest Indiana Jones movie reflects a dramatic change in modern culture since Raiders of the Lost Ark hit the screens nearly three decades ago.

 


Censoring intelligent design

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 26, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Expelled!—another man’s personal experience of state school anti-Christian intolerance in the USA.

 


Genesis: Myth or History?

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 23, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments A critic suggests that Genesis 1–11 was written in the genre of myth rather than as a literal historical account. How do we know it’s not myth?

 


Platypus thumbs its nose (or bill) at evolutionary scientists

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 22, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Just as the outside of a platypus was awkward for evolutionary expectations, now that the platypus genome has been published, the ‘inside’ of a platypus is just as much of an enigma.

 


Famous evangelical apologist changes his mind

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 20, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments RC Sproul says he is now a six-day, young-earth creationist.

 


My amazing paradigm change

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 19, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Unexpected gift gives new knowledge and assurance in God the Creator.

 


Do monkeys play football?

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 18, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Football’s governing bodies are trying to stop racist taunts from spectators. But do they understand the problem?

 


Radiometric dating and old ages in disarray

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 14, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments A review of Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth, Volume II: Results of a Young-Earth Creationist Research Initiative

 


Islam: Religion of Life, or Religion of Death?

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 13, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments It’s a life-or-death issue, but many can’t see it.

 


The London Geological Society of London uses bully tactics

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 12, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Why do they rely on insults, misinformation, stereotypes and scare tactics, instead of addressing what creationists are actually saying and using coherent, logical scientific arguments to make their case?

 


The Geological Society of London uses bully tactics

Posted by Creation On The Web - May 12, 2008 on 6:00 pm | In Creation Science | No Comments Why do they rely on insults, misinformation, stereotypes and scare tactics, instead of addressing what creationists are actually saying and using coherent, logical scientific arguments to make their case?

 


« Previous Page — Next Page »