• Home Page
• Computer Blog
• Chess Blog
• Exercise & Diet Blog
• Theology Blog
• Islamic Terrorism Blog
• Contact Us

Cotton Comes to Harlem

Barack Obama wants us to have a national dialogue on race. Very well, then. Dialogue is a two-way street.

"We may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren."

I don't want to move the country in the same direction as Obama wants to take it. His hopes aren't my hopes. His definition of a better future doesn't comport with mine.

"Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity."

No, we've only seen how appealing it is to a segment of registered democrats who vote in democrat primaries-mainly black voters, white yuppies, and college students.

"On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap."

Sounds like a very plausible explanation to me.

"I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy."

He decided to condemn them after attending Wright's church for twenty-years, and only after the statements became a political liability. That's not a very credible or convincing disclaimer.

Moreover, he issued a very generic condemnation. I'd like to see Obama comment on the specific allegations raised by his "spiritual mentor."

"Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed."

I wouldn't sit for 20 years under the preaching of racist, paranoid hatemonger, or make large contributions to his church. Wright is a black Klansman. He's David Duke in a parallel universe. Just substitute "Aryan" for "African." Just substitute the pointy hat for the dashiki robe.

"As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity."

I don't object to his comments because they were divisive. I object to his comments because they were false.

"And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way."

To the contrary, this goes to the core Rev. Wright's black liberation theology.

"The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith."

That no doubt explains a lot about Obama's nominal Christianity.

"Like other black churches, Trinity's services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear."

I don't object to the tone of voice or style of worship. I object to the heretical theology and the crackpot conspiracy theories.

"I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community."

Well, that tells you a lot about Obama's insular experience of the black community. If he were to sit under Tony Evans or John Perkins for 20 years, he'd have a very different impression of the black community.

"I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother."

Of course he can. We choose a pastor. We don't choose a grandmother.

"We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue."

That would be a promising first step.

"We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country.'

Except that this is Obama's cue to do that very thing.

"But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow."

Is that really the source of the problem? Barack Obama is the son of an immigrant. But Barack went on to attend Columbia and Harvard. Became editor of the Harvard Law Review. Is currently a U.S. Senator.

Doesn't sound like Barack was held back by the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow. Rather, it sounds like the proverbial American Dream. America as the land of opportunity.

What about his wife? Michelle attended Princeton and Harvard. Was associate student Dean at Chicago U. Doesn't sound like Michelle was held back by the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.

The Obamas have something in the neighborhood of a seven digit annual income. If that's the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow, then it's a pretty lucrative legacy.

If we're going to rewind the loop-tape on slavery, here's a better place to start:

Link: Michael Medved

Continuing with Obama:

"Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven't fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today's black and white students."

Is that what explains the achievement gap? What about broken homes or the hip-hop culture?

"That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today's urban and rural communities."

Rural poverty is hardly limited to blacks. And the narco trade can be quite lucrative.

"And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods - parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement - all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us."

When law enforcement tries to crack down on inner city crime, it's accused of police brutality and racial profiling.

"But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn't make it - those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination."

What about people who are ultimately defeated by their self-defeating lifestyle?

"The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning."

This is really rich coming from Obama. If he is opposed to racial segregation, why did he attend a black church rather than a multi-ethnic church-and not just a black church, but a black nationalist church? A church with a militantly Afrocentric theology? This is racial self-segregation, and proudly so.

"That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change."

But unlike John Perkins or Bill Cosby, Obama has no track recording of squarely facing this self-destructive complicity.

"So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time."

Does this mean that Obama is opposed to affirmative action? Wasn't he a civil rights attorney?

"Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism."

Maybe because so much of the discussion is an exercise in political correctness or reverse discrimination.

"In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination."

But what if it's not the legacy of discrimination? What if it's the result of lifestyle choices made in the here and now?

He follows this with the usual, Nannystate prescription. Let's expand on the failed policies of the past. Throw more money down the drain.

"In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world's great religions demand - that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper."

There was no welfare state in Scripture. Biblical charity took the form of workfare, not welfare.

And if he wants to cite Scripture, a good place to start would be the Book of Proverbs.

"For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism."

But his career has been defined by identity politics.

"This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools."

He wants to talk about buildings. Not about unruly students. Not about incompetent teachers. Not about liberal indoctrination as a substitute for job skills.

"This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care."

What about the ER filled with illegal immigrants?

As far as "postracial" candidates are concerned, I'll take Bobby Jindal over Barack Obama any day of the week.

What we can’t say about black-on-white crime

The article below was originally posted on Worldnetdaily.com

I have been reading a new book called “Darwins Plantation” by Ken Ham and Charles Ware and found the following article of interest. I’ll let you know what I think about the book and the topic of racism after you read the following article (the article is not from the book):

____________________________________________________

What we can’t say about black-on-white crime

In the case of the Michigan teens, Dustin Kaiser, Michael Carter and an unnamed 14-year-old girl, two victims survived to bear witness. Their assailants were convicted but, once again, no hate crime charges.

Regardless of the particulars of a given case, a phenomenon is becoming apparent in America: White on black is standing out far more than black on white.

Just watch the startling video of the assault on the white straphanger. If it had shown a white gang attacking an innocent black man, does anyone really believe the footage wouldn’t be featured on every news broadcast?

Then, the young girl in the Michigan case was forced to perform sexual acts, and all three victims were shot in the head. And Newsom and Christian were sexually mutilated in unspeakable ways. Yet, the scarcity of national news coverage is striking.

The reason is obvious. Such cases don’t conform to the Shill Media’s favored fiction, their narrative about prejudiced whites and persecuted blacks.

Speaking of fiction, America is not a “racist” nation, not compared to other lands anyway. But there are racial problems, most of which go unmentioned. Why?

Because most originate in the black community.

We’re not supposed to say it, but, contrary to leftist dogma, blacks in America are far more bigoted than whites. The truth is that black bigotry is whitewashed.

I know, I’ll be called a “racist” just for saying this – that’s part of the blame game – but it’s not hard to understand. Blacks and whites have very different upbringings. Weaned on political correctness, most modern white children are told that the worst thing one can be is a racist. They’re bombarded with messages about how their race owned slaves and is privileged, about how bigotry characterizes it. They’re told that if you have racial feelings, you’re a bad person.

While political correctness should be squelched, most would agree that teaching kids to view every individual as a child of God deserving of dignity is a wonderful thing. But understand something: Within the context of man’s history and outside our bubble-wrapped world, it’s also a very unusual thing.

Hatred easily finds a place in the heart, and blaming “them” for our woes and travails is natural for man. Why do Palestinians often call Jews “apes and pigs”? Why do Hutus in Rwanda call the rival Tutsis “cockroaches”? Why have there been ethnic conflicts in all corners of the Earth since time immemorial? While I’m sure sociologists could wax somnolent rendering theses on the matter, the simple truth is that in most of the world what reigns is not political correctness, but group correctness.

This brings us to the black community. Race is not only a big issue within it, it’s a much different one. Most black children are raised not to revile their race, but revere it. Often, hatred toward whites isn’t lamented, but lauded as the attitude of a racial patriot toward “oppressors.” And just as anonymous Jews incur the stone-throwing wrath of anonymous Palestinians, a white man or woman on a bus or subway is not an innocent, but an enemy. Viewed through this prism, the persecution of such hapless souls is merely the exacting of vengeance.

Relevant here is comedian Chris Rock’s skit about how all black people hate whites, and the idea that behind every joke lies some truth. While the operative word is “some,” it amounts to many. Could it be otherwise? If for decades you do the racial politics dance – the Jackson-Jena Jig – where every real or perceived problem in the black community is attributed to “the Man,” black youths are going to be embittered.

This bitterness is reflected in and exacerbated by the bile disgorged by rap thugs. The song “Kill d’White People” by Apache includes the line: “Kill the white people; we gonna make them hurt. …”

And the Menace Clan says in “Kill Whitey,” “Niggas in the church say: kill whitey all night long. …”

Despite this, we still labor under the illusion that white skin equates to a white sheet, and hate crime laws have become get-whitey laws. And the powers-that-be will continue to exercise double standards until they acknowledge the deep seeds of hatred sown by demagogues in black America.

I won’t hold my breath waiting, though. You see, you’re not supposed to say these things, and you’re a racist if you do. So, yes, I’m guilty. Just like O.J. Simpson is innocent.

End of Article____________________________________________________

This article has put into words much of what I see and hear in the news everyday. I am strongly against racism of any kind. What has made me upset the last few months though is the idea that only white folks can be racist. I have heard Black Leaders on the News say how racist this white person, or that white person is, while never acknowledging their own racist remarks.

The book that has led me to think more deeply about this subject is “Darwins Plantation.” This book makes some really strong points, especially that at the root of the worst racism is evolutionary thinking (”They are less ‘evolved’ than me.”). Those of us who believe all humans were created by God, believe that all races are equal.

While I recommend the book, I can see that it falls into the same problem as the media: it only talks about and discusses the “racism” that was/is exhibited by whites. I believe that the terrible events and racism of the past cannot be used to justify racism in the present. I tend to agree with the above author that whites are generally taught that racism is wrong, while blacks are taught they are the victims of whites. The push is to make whites feel ‘bad’ for the actions of their ancestor…. and bad as people now.

I have heard the term “reverse racism” used on occasion when someone finally does acknowledge that racial groups other than whites can also be racist. It’s not ‘reverse racism’…. its just plain ugly racism!

Racism is wrong… all racism… whether from whites or blacks. We are all responsible for our own actions (not those who lived a hundred years ago), and will someday be held accountable for them.